Research

Surgical success for patients with focal drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) relies on accurate localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ). Currently, no exam delineates this zone unambiguously. Instead, the EZ is approximated by the area where seizures begin, which is identified manually through a tedious process that is prone to errors and biases. More importantly, resection of this area does not always predict good surgical outcome. Here, we propose an artificially intelligent, patient-specific framework that automatically identifies the EZ requiring little to no input from clinicians, without having to wait for a seizure to occur. The framework transforms interictal intracranial electroencephalography data into spatiotemporal representations of brain activity discriminating the interictal epileptogenic network from background activity. The epileptogenic network delineates the EZ with high precision and predicts surgical outcome. Our framework eliminates the need for manual data inspection, reduces prolonged monitoring, and enhances surgical planning for DRE patients.

In drug-resistant epilepsy, a visual inspection of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) signals is often needed to localize the epileptogenic zone (EZ) and guide neurosurgery. The visual assessment of iEEG time-frequency (TF) images is an alternative to signal inspection, but subtle variations may escape the human eye. Here, we propose a deep learning-based metric of visual complexity to interpret TF images extracted from iEEG data and aim to assess its ability to identify the EZ in the brain. We analyzed interictal iEEG data from 1928 contacts recorded from 20 children with drug-resistant epilepsy who became seizure-free after neurosurgery. We localized each iEEG contact in the MRI, created TF images (1-70 Hz) for each contact, and used a pre-trained VGG16 network to measure their visual complexity by extracting unsupervised activation energy (UAE) from 13 convolutional layers. We identified points of interest in the brain using the UAE values via patient- and layer-specific thresholds (based on extreme value distribution) and using a support vector machine classifier. Results show that contacts inside the seizure onset zone exhibit lower UAE than outside, with larger differences in deep layers (L10, L12, and L13: p < 0.001). Furthermore, the points of interest identified using the support vector machine, localized the EZ with 7 mm accuracy. In conclusion, we presented a pre-surgical computerized tool that facilitates the EZ localization in the patient's MRI without requiring long-term iEEG inspection.

OBJECTIVE: Interictal biomarkers are critical for identifying the epileptogenic focus. However, spikes and ripples lack specificity while fast ripples lack sensitivity. These biomarkers propagate from more epileptogenic onset to areas of spread. The pathophysiological mechanism of these propagations is elusive. Here, we examine zones where spikes and high frequency oscillations co-occur (SHFO), the spatiotemporal propagations of spikes, ripples, and fast ripples, and evaluate the spike-ripple onset overlap (SRO) as an epilepsy biomarker.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed intracranial EEG data from 41 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We mapped propagations of spikes, ripples, and fast ripples, and identified their onset and spread zones, as well as SHFO and SRO. We then estimated the SRO prognostic value in predicting surgical outcome and compared it to onset and spread zones of spike, ripple, and fast ripple propagations, and SHFO.

RESULTS: We detected spikes and ripples in all patients and fast ripples in 12 patients (29%). We observed spike and ripple propagations in 40 (98%) patients. Spike and ripple onsets overlapped in 35 (85%) patients. In good outcome patients, SRO showed higher specificity and precision (p < 0.05) in predicting resection compared to onset and zones of spikes, ripples, and SHFO. Only SRO resection predicted outcome (p = 0.01) with positive and negative predictive values of 82% and 57%, respectively.

INTERPRETATION: SRO is a specific and precise biomarker of the epileptogenic zone whose removal predicts outcome. SRO is present in most patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Such a biomarker may reduce prolonged intracranial monitoring and improve outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To deconstruct the epileptogenic networks of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) using source functional connectivity (FC) analysis; unveil the FC biomarkers of the epileptogenic zone (EZ); and develop machine learning (ML) models to estimate the EZ using brief interictal electroencephalography (EEG) data.

METHODS: We analyzed scalp EEG from 50 patients with DRE who had surgery. We reconstructed the activity (electrical source imaging [ESI]) of virtual sensors (VSs) across the whole cortex and computed FC separately for epileptiform and non-epileptiform EEG epochs (with or without spikes). In patients with good outcome (Engel 1a), four cortical regions were defined: EZ (resection) and three non-epileptogenic zones (NEZs) in the same and opposite hemispheres. Region-specific FC features in six frequency bands and three spatial ranges (long, short, inner) were compared between regions (Wilcoxon sign-rank). We developed ML classifiers to identify the VSs in the EZ using VS-specific FC features. Cross-validation was performed using good outcome data. Performance was compared with poor outcomes and interictal spike localization.

RESULTS: FC differed between EZ and NEZs (p < .05) during non-epileptiform and epileptiform epochs, showing higher FC in the EZ than its homotopic contralateral NEZ. During epileptiform epochs, the NEZ in the epileptogenic hemisphere showed higher FC than its contralateral NEZ. In good outcome patients, the ML classifiers reached 75% accuracy to the resection (91% sensitivity; 74% specificity; distance from EZ: 38 mm) using epileptiform epochs (gamma and beta frequency bands) and 62% accuracy using broadband non-epileptiform epochs, both outperforming spike localization (accuracy = 47%; p < .05; distance from EZ: 57 mm). Lower performance was seen in poor outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE: We present an FC approach to extract EZ biomarkers from brief EEG data. Increased FC in various frequencies characterized the EZ during epileptiform and non-epileptiform epochs. FC-based ML models identified the resection better in good than poor outcome patients, demonstrating their potential for presurgical use in pediatric DRE.

INTRODUCTION: Literature lacks studies investigating the cortical generation of sleep spindles in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and how they evolve after resection of the epileptogenic zone (EZ). Here, we examined sleep EEGs of children with focal DRE who became seizure-free after focal epilepsy surgery, and aimed to investigate the changes in the spindle generation before and after the surgery using low-density scalp EEG and electrical source imaging (ESI).

METHODS: We analyzed N2-sleep EEGs from 19 children with DRE before and after surgery. We identified slow (8-12 Hz) and fast spindles (13-16 Hz), computed their spectral features and cortical generators through ESI and computed their distance from the EZ and irritative zone (IZ). We performed two-way ANOVA testing the effect of spindle type (slow vs. fast) and surgical phase (pre-surgery vs. post-surgery) on each feature.

RESULTS: Power, frequency and cortical activation of slow spindles increased after surgery (p < 0.005), while this was not seen for fast spindles. Before surgery, the cortical generators of slow spindles were closer to the EZ (57.3 vs. 66.2 mm, p = 0.007) and IZ (41.3 vs. 55.5 mm, p = 0.02) than fast spindle generators.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate alterations in the EEG slow spindles after resective epilepsy surgery. Fast spindle generation on the contrary did not change after surgery. Although the study is limited by its retrospective nature, lack of healthy controls, and reduced cortical spatial sampling, our findings suggest a spatial relationship between the slow spindles and the epileptogenic generators.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is an imaging technique that enables the assessment of cortical activity via direct measures of neurophysiology. It is a non-invasive and passive technique that is completely painless. MEG has gained increasing prominence in the field of pediatric neuroimaging. This dedicated review article for the pediatric population summarizes the fundamental technical and clinical aspects of MEG for the clinician. We discuss methods tailored for children to improve data quality, including child-friendly MEG facility environments and strategies to mitigate motion artifacts. We provide an in-depth overview on accurate localization of neural sources and different analysis methods, as well as data interpretation. The contemporary platforms and approaches of two quaternary pediatric referral centers are illustrated, shedding light on practical implementations in clinical settings. Finally, we describe the expanding clinical applications of MEG, including its pivotal role in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy patients, presurgical mapping of eloquent cortices (somatosensory and motor cortices, visual and auditory cortices, lateralization of language), its emerging relevance in autism spectrum disorder research and potential future clinical applications, and its utility in assessing mild traumatic brain injury. In conclusion, this review serves as a comprehensive resource of clinicians as well as researchers, offering insights into the evolving landscape of pediatric MEG. It discusses the importance of technical advancements, data acquisition strategies, and expanding clinical applications in harnessing the full potential of MEG to study neurological conditions in the pediatric population.